In urban models, which statement correctly contrasts the Hoyt sector model and the multiple-nuclei model?

In urban models, which statement correctly contrasts the Hoyt sector model and the multiple-nuclei model?

• A. Hoyt sector model describes multiple centers of activity; multiple-nuclei model describes wedge-shaped sectors.
• B. Hoyt sector model describes wedge-shaped sectors; multiple-nuclei model posits several centers.
• C. Multiple-nuclei model describes a single centralized CBD; Hoyt describes several centers.
• D. Hoyt sector model is not used anymore.

Answer: (B)

Describing how urban areas organize activity around centers. The Hoyt sector model envisions growth in wedge-shaped sectors radiating from a central business district, with each sector extending along transport routes and around barriers. The multiple-nuclei model, on the other hand, proposes several centers or nuclei where different activities cluster, so a single CBD isn’t the only focus. This distinction—Hoyt outlining wedge-shaped sectors and multiple-nuclei positing several centers—is why the statement is the best fit. The other descriptions mix up the shapes or the number of centers (or inappropriately claim Hoyt isn’t used), which doesn’t align with what each model actually proposes.

Describing how urban areas organize activity around centers. The Hoyt sector model envisions growth in wedge-shaped sectors radiating from a central business district, with each sector extending along transport routes and around barriers. The multiple-nuclei model, on the other hand, proposes several centers or nuclei where different activities cluster, so a single CBD isn’t the only focus. This distinction—Hoyt outlining wedge-shaped sectors and multiple-nuclei positing several centers—is why the statement is the best fit. The other descriptions mix up the shapes or the number of centers (or inappropriately claim Hoyt isn’t used), which doesn’t align with what each model actually proposes.